Showing posts with label samsung. Show all posts
Showing posts with label samsung. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Samsung 256GB SSD coming later this year

The current generation of SSD's are smaller and slower than regular disks in the same form factor, but this is starting to change as products like this Samsung 256GB SSD reach the market. It has a 200 Mbyte/s read speed and 160Mbyte/s sequential write speed, in a standard 2.5" disk form factor.

So the sequence goes like this:

1) SSD's will be faster for random access (already happened)

2) SSD's will be faster for sequential access (coming later this year)

3) SSD's will be higher capacity (maybe next year?)

4) SSD's will be lower cost per GB (when production volumes ramp up)

The advantage in random access and reliability (due to no moving parts) means that relatively fewer SSDs are needed than spinning rust disks to provide the same availability and performance, so the end user cost per configured GB should switch in favor of SSDs earlier.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

Samsung S3C6410 mobile processor

Samsung's latest device runs at 667MHz and includes video capture acceleration that claims to use much less power to compress or decompress video streams.

The device is sampling in Q2 and shipping in volume later in 2008, and there is a lot of speculation going around that this may be the CPU that Apple uses in its next generation 3G capable iPhone.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Flash based SSD from Samsung

A nice review of a Flash based SSD in Engadget. This 64GB drive from Samsung is a drop-in replacement for a 2.5" hard drive. Its fast, but still too expensive for common use.

Thursday, March 29, 2007

Flash Solid State Disk (SSD) for Millicomputers

The days of keeping bits on spinning rust are coming to an end....

Both Samsung and SANdisk have announced 32GB SSDs. SANdisk's comsumes 0.9W max (competing disks take 1.9W) and fits in a 1.8 or 2.5" drive form factor with ATA interface. The sequential performance of these SSDs is similar to normal disks for reads, a bit slower for pure writes, but as soon as you start doing random reads or writes they are an order of magnitude faster than disks. The smaller the random accesses the bigger the relative speedup. The latest announcement from Samsung is a 1.8" 64GB version, and there is some discussion about the growth of this market in the press release.

This makes perfect sense for millcomputers. Small millicomputers can be directly connected to gigabytes of NAND flash via the SDIO interface, and larger millicomputers can use ATA interfaces to connect to flash-SSDs. The extra random performance of the SSD offsets the lack of disk spindles in a compact design and will make IO intensive workloads extremely competitive for millicomputing.

The MTBF (reliability) of SSDs is also far higher than disks. A mirrored pair of disks may be replaced with a single SSD since it has much higher reliability. This helps offset the current price premium paid for the SSD.

In the past SSDs have been built using technologies that were far more expensive than disks. Flash based SSDs have now reduced the gap, and the trend is that SSDs will eventually become bigger and cheaper than disks, the only question is when, and my answer is sooner than you think!

Update: here is a detailed benchmark review from Tomshardware.com.